“One Origin, Two Currents: The Cultural Harmony of Jainism and Hinduism”

“One Origin, Two Currents: The Cultural Harmony of Jainism and Hinduism”

---

The religious and philosophical traditions of the Indian subcontinent have long exemplified coexistence, dialogue, and mutual exchange. While Jainism and Hinduism are often perceived as distinct, a comparative study of historical texts, religious literature, and philosophical foundations reveals profound similarities. These similarities support the idea that both traditions emerged from the same cultural soil and have complemented each other throughout history.

Ancient India’s religious structure was enriched by diverse schools of thought, among which Jain, Buddhist, and Vedic traditions were prominent. However, Jainism and Hinduism share a unique closeness. Symbols, values, and principles mentioned in the Rigveda, Upanishads, Mahabharata, Puranas, and other Hindu scriptures also find resonance in Jain literature.

The Rigveda mentions a sage named Rishabha, whom many scholars identify as the first Tirthankara, Rishabhadeva. In Rigveda (10.136), a figure named "Rishabha" is described as an ascetic or "Muni," whose lifestyle aligns with that of Jain monks. The Bhagavata Purana (5.3.20) describes Rishabha as an incarnation of Vishnu, saying: “Rishabho nāma bhagavān ādināmno’bhavat sutaḥ,” i.e., “Lord Rishabha, son of Adinath, appeared.” In Jain texts as well, Rishabhadeva is known as Adinath, and his life story, teachings, and ideal of renunciation are strikingly similar to those described in the Purana.

Renowned historian Hermann Jacobi, a German scholar celebrated for his study of ancient Indian religions, emphasized in his works Jaina Sutras (Sacred Books of the East, Volumes 22 and 45) that Jainism emerged parallel to Vedic religion but maintained strong social and philosophical connections to the Vedic tradition. According to Jacobi, Jainism was not a new movement but one that evolved within the Vedic cultural matrix.

Traces of Jain values are also evident in the Mahabharata. Whether it is the tale of the sage Astika halting King Janamejaya’s serpent sacrifice or Bhishma’s teachings to Yudhishthira, the themes of non-violence, non-attachment, and restraint echo Jain ideals. For example, the teaching that “it is better to live truthfully in a hut than unjustly in a palace” closely mirrors Jain philosophical thought.

The Jain scripture Acharanga Sutra treats non-violence (Ahimsa) as a foundational life principle. A parallel thought is found in the Bhagavad Gita (13.7): “Ahimsa satyam akrodhas tyagah shantir apaisunam” (Non-violence, truth, freedom from anger, renunciation, peace, absence of malice). Likewise, Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras discuss Yamas and Niyamas—Ahimsa, Satya, Asteya, Brahmacharya, Aparigraha—which align with the five major vows of Jain monks.

The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (4.4.23) declares, “Na hinsyat sarva bhutani” (One should not harm any living being), directly echoing Jainism’s core tenet of non-violence. The Upanishads’ focus on the soul's immortality and rebirth is also elaborated in Jain doctrine through the law of karma.

In Hinduism, Lord Shiva is depicted as a yogic ascetic—naked, with matted hair, a serpent around his neck, and deeply meditative. Similarly, Jain Tirthankaras are shown in Digambara (nude) posture, with matted locks and free from worldly ties. This visual similarity goes beyond symbolism—it represents a shared ideal of renunciation and the pursuit of self-realization and liberation.

Both religions accept the doctrine of karma. Though their interpretations may differ, the belief that every being’s journey is shaped by past actions is a core principle in both. The Bhagavad Gita (4.17) asserts: “Karmaṇo hy api boddhavyaṁ”—one must understand karma. The Jain text Tattvartha Sutra by Umasvati begins with: “Samyag darshana jnana charitrani mokshamargah” (Right faith, knowledge, and conduct are the path to liberation), highlighting a similar spiritual trajectory.

From a philosophical standpoint, there is also alignment. The Samkhya school of Hinduism, one of its six classical philosophies, distinguishes between soul and matter—similar to the Jain distinction between Jiva (soul) and Ajiva (non-soul). In both, the soul is regarded as independent, sentient, and pure. Jainism’s Anekantavada (plurality of viewpoints) is supported by the Rigveda’s famous line: “Ekam sad vipra bahudha vadanti” (Truth is one, but the wise call it by many names) (Rigveda 1.164.46).

The Puranas and Upa-Puranas also mention Tirthankaras. Skanda Purana and Padma Purana speak of Rishabhadeva, Neminatha (who is said to be Krishna’s cousin), and other Tirthankaras. This indicates that these figures were revered in both Jain and Hindu traditions.

Socially and culturally, Jain and Hindu families have shared close relationships for centuries. Their rituals, festivals, and ways of life show remarkable similarity. For instance, Diwali, typically seen as a Hindu festival, is also of great significance in Jainism—it marks the day of Lord Mahavira’s nirvana. Festivals like Ashtahnika, Akshaya Tritiya, and Raksha Bandhan are celebrated with equal devotion in both traditions.

Scholar K.K. Dixit, in his book Origin and Antiquity of Jainism, states that both Jain and Vedic traditions have roots in the Indus-Saraswati civilization and are part of a shared cultural heritage.

Jain texts such as Kalpa Sutra (authored by Bhadrabahu) and Tattvartha Sutra serve as spiritual compasses not just for Jains but for Indian philosophy at large. Similarly, the Vedas, Upanishads, Gita, and Puranas form Hinduism’s spiritual core. Yet, their inner message—of values, resolution, and spiritual search—does not diverge significantly from Jain thought.

Perhaps the most visible proof of cultural unity lies in the temple architecture—Jain Tirthankara idols are found in Hindu temples, and Hindu deities’ images are seen in Jain temples. In medieval temples such as Khajuraho, Mount Abu, and Shravanabelagola, artistic representations of both traditions coexist harmoniously.

Historian R.C. Majumdar, in The History and Culture of the Indian People (Volume II), affirms that “Jainism has been an integral part of Indian culture, and rather than opposing the Vedic tradition, it presents that same foundational culture from a different viewpoint.” The book also notes that several Jain scholars were educated in Vedic institutions and deeply studied Vedas and scriptures.

Thus, based on historical, philosophical, and cultural evidence, it becomes evident that Jainism and Hinduism are not fundamentally different, but rather two streams of the same spiritual tradition. Their religious practices, ethical values, doctrines of karma and moksha, and societal conduct are so closely aligned that they appear to have emerged from a unified cultural consciousness.

In conclusion, even if Jainism is considered a distinct religion, it can still be seen as a branch that grew on the soil of Hinduism—nourished by the same roots. Their common values of truth, non-violence, renunciation, austerity, liberation, and self-realization bind them in a shared spiritual ethos.

©® Payal Laxmi Soni